Im sure the speaker was way too wasted to know what was going on. Look at em..He's buzzed up drunk. 

The pubs have worked all their lives to feed their own families- 

Yawn. Ignorant meme's for ignorant folks. 

Actually pubs want PEOPLE to feed their own families, not the government like the dems want. 

dumb, worthless responses.

everyone would like to feed their own families. how about we pay wages so that's possible? that keeps them off the government tit. sorry it went over your collective heads. 

dumb, worthless responses.

..... for a dumb, worthless post. 

i set soup on ignore eons ago but i still see he has posted after me on every. single. topic. no wonder his nose is brown and his breath smells like poopoo. bahaha 

Actually pubs want PEOPLE to feed their own families, not the government like the dems want.

That can't be true. Pubs don't want to raise the min wage. By attempting to repeal the ACA, Pubs are ok with people living one medical disaster away from life long poverty. By way of pushing for the Keystone XL the pubs are ok with an ecology that is too toxic for human consumption. 

s.s.d.d. no pun intended!!! bahahahahahahahahaaaa 

That can't be true. Pubs don't want to raise the min wage. By attempting to repeal the ACA, Pubs are ok with people living one medical disaster away from life long poverty. By way of pushing for the Keystone XL the pubs are ok with an ecology that is too toxic for human consumption.


this is why i know more pubies on the government titties than all other political parties combined. (queue the pub poster who will say, 'we are for the hand up not the hand out.') 

i set soup on ignore eons ago but i still see he has posted after me on every. single. topic.

Its like the proverbial booger one can't flick..lol. 

this is why i know more pubies on the government titties than all other political parties combined.

Prove it. 

Conceivably, if we were to raise the minimum wage to a level where families could support themselves, the people needing government welfare would lessen. So instead of of using tax payer money from individuals, the burden of supporting the lower income families would be on corporations. 

Its like the proverbial booger one can't flick..lol.

Yeah. Nose picker is exactly what I took you for.

 

i set soup on ignore eons ago

Only because you're afraid of me. 

Gotta love the willingness to work together this President brings.

"If you don't pass what I want, I will veto it"

"I took an oath to do what I want"

- excuse me, your oath was to protect the United States and the Constitution. 

this is why i know more pubies on the government titties than all other political parties combined.

Prove it.


Voting record.

Bad choice of words WIP but good analogy. They are on the lobbyist / special interest tit. The revolving door of special interest and gov moves more people through gov via the republican party than any other party. Wash them hands soup e boy. 

Yeah. Nose picker is exactly what I took you for.

and your at the end of that finger. lol 

What words were a bad choice? 

Voting record.

That's not proof.

Try again. 

What words were a bad choice?

LOL........ those that made sense. 

Wash them hands soup e boy.

I'm not the nose picker. 

What words were a bad choice?

this is why i know more pubies on the government titties than all other political parties combined.

The GOP is the gov tit. One of them anyway. Its the lobbyist that are on the tit. The GOP is on the lobbyist tit. Sort of like a $ 69..lol.

Good analogy just the same. 

Good analogy just the same.

You live in a strange world, Mark. 

Wash them hands soup e boy.

I'm not the nose picker.

No your not. Your at the end of that finger. Wipe it off on a tissue. 

No your not.

Makes no sense. 

The GOP is the gov tit. One of them anyway. Its the lobbyist that are on the tit. The GOP is on the lobbyist tit. Sort of like a $ 69..lol.

Good analogy just the same.

A proper analogy doesn't consist of sophomoric, partisan rhetoric or cyclic idiocy. And they usually make sense and have an actual point to make. 

Why is it so hard to understand? Most pubs started out the same as everyone else- no silver spoon in their mouths- they worked a little harder, any many times put everything on the line to start up a business- some worked their butts off and did well- others put themselves thru school to obtain a degree to do well working for others- they saved their money, and invested it, in order for their kids to have a better life-then here comes the government,who decides they've done too well, they should give it to others who haven't worked or taken chances to have a better life- does that seem fair to you? 

And they usually make sense and have an actual point to make.

LOL......... I don't understand half the stuff he posts any longer. I just makes little to no sense. 

I have to say I don't understand your point, Mark- it makes no sense... 

It seems fair Tat, when you realize that not everyone had the same starting off point. You had the privilege of starting in a white, middle class family, so you had the values, connections, teachings, and tools that allowed you succeed. But if you had been born in the inner city, you wouldn't have any of that.

But a higher minimum wage would allow a chance for those without as many skills to have access to the schools/organizations etc. that could teach those skills, assuring upward mobility for us all. 

That' s a wonderful, idealistic thought, honey- it just doesn't work that way, except in Utopia- 

But just as a thought experiment, hear me out. A single mother, living on minimum wage, working McDonalds, is forced to live in poor neighborhoods with high crime/low expectations, etc. If the minimum wage were raised to something more realistic for a family (something approx. $50k/year if working 40 hours a week), then she could afford to move her family into a better Neigjborhood with better schools, less crime, higher expectations, and so on. Her kids would be equipped to work in jobs higher than minimum wage as a result. 

Its like the proverbial booger one can't flick..lol.


his nose is always to either mr mark's butt or my own. it's buried deep. kind of like the dog who has to roll in crap. he can't help himself. 

A proper analogy doesn't consist of sophomoric, partisan rhetoric or cyclic idiocy.


Then someone call the grammar police. btw detective..I didn't call it a proper analogy. I called it a good one. 

It wasn't that either. 

I have a better idea- she could have gone to a community college (contrary to what O thinks) isn't expensive, so that she could get a better job- why should employers have to pay her more for not being more educated? She could also, if she has any ambition, work her way up to manager- these are things we did- 

But if you had been born in the inner city, you wouldn't have any of that.

Dr. Ben Carson was born in the inner city and he succeeded.

But just as a thought experiment

Your thought experiment is flawed because to accomplish your scenario, prices on everything would dramatically rise and the $50k/year would become the poverty level. 

Did you seriously just say that those born in the inner city don't have values, teachings, tools or connections?

You couldn't be any more clueless if you tried.