Damn right! 

IWT,

You are obviously getting paid to promote a candidate on a message board. Congrats on finding one that allows and welcomes it.

Would you mind sharing the name of the company that pays you? Private message me if you prefer. 

You are obviously getting paid to promote a candidate on a message board. Congrats on finding one that allows and welcomes it.

That's a really big assumption. Once again, you prove my point by resorting to an insult when you disagree with a message. 

You have a unique definition of insult that requires it to be false. We have yet to establish that, correct?

What makes you think I disagree with a message?

Would it be so difficult to believe that I’m observing the OP primarily posts political memes that promote Trump, and rarely if ever gets into any meaningful discussion on any topic?

In other words, he/she is phoning it in by making only a minimal effort to promote a candidate. It’s like he/she is merely attempting to check a checkbox and relying on data counts. Have you not noticed that it is not just one topic he bumps, but multiple ones at the same time that cover the same concepts? That is exactly what paid political operatives do.

Engaging in that kind of obsessive behavior is foreign to me, but I’m sure there’s a good explanation for it. Being paid is the most reasonable explanation to me. I’m open to learn about other explanations. 

KwM - as expected you are wrong. 

Fair enough. So it’s just an odd obsession that I can’t comprehend. I guess you’re kind of like that Caveman Barney character that posts here. This place attracts all kinds.

Sometimes people have to choose more provocative methods to get answer to questions. 

Do you have any interest in discussing any of those, or do you just like simplistic and inaccurate political memes as a substitute for discussion? 

KwMillennial --- I guess you?re kind of like that Caveman Barney character that posts here. This place attracts all kinds.

You should know...let's see, you been here like 200 days...SMH 

While exaggerated it's mostly spot on. 

So true! 

While exaggerated it's mostly spot on. 
It’s as if you cannot even see the meme strategy that depends on gullibility of the reader.

The psychological trick is to take a very practical view on an issue that most Americans regardless of party can agree with, label that as the good party, then take the most extremist examples from the other party and portray that as the norm for that party. People highly susceptible to this psychological trick will for the most part accept it as mostly true.

Gullible people on both sides buy into tricks like this. 

1