Kingwood Underground
the heart and soul of our Kingwood, Texas family
Login - Create Account - Help
Clean out your garage on Kingwood bookoo! Or find local garage sales on Yard Sale Search.com
KU Live!

OAN - One American News

who's talking here?

wayward1 3
Emperor of Kingwood 1
Butterbean 1
RayofHope 7
fuzz81 6
JustWatching 2

     » send to friend     » save in my favorites     » flag dangerous topic flag as a dangerous topic

RayofHope --- 362 days ago -

Just found a news cable network that sticks to facts. They do not appear to spread fake news (from the right or left). I did not know they still existed.

Objective News Network 

fuzz81 --- 362 days ago -

Partisan garbage network.

Charles Herring, in an interview in CPAC, said "Fox is a great platform, a lot of conservatives like it, it gets outstanding ratings. There is nothing wrong with Fox. The problem is that if you take the channel lineup, the sources of national news tend to lean to the left?and all we have is Fox." 

RayofHope --- 362 days ago -

Partisan garbage network.

OAN seems to be the only network that is not partisan, though Fox normally presents both sides of controversial issues.

CNN has become extreme. The Harvard study found CNN attacking Trump more than any other network.

The night of the Manchester terrorist act I tired of watching FOX and turned to CNN. And, CNN was rehashing old Trump investigation stories. I came back to CNN three times during that hour and they were still talking about Trump (At a time when a bomber killed 28 and wounded 50).

Think about it, if you were a news producer, would you choose a story about a terrorism act killing many, or the same story of Trump collusion that you had been using for the past three days.

No wonder CNN ratings are in the basement. 

JustWatching --- 361 days ago -

^^^^^^^^^^^
You will never convince the liberals of this because they can only see their side. Anyone who disagrees is wrong as far as they are concerned. 

fuzz81 --- 361 days ago -

Yes, because you're known for admitting when you're wrong when you "disagree". There's a big difference between ignorance to facts and disagreeing on an opinion.

Remember when you were sooooooo sure that trump campaign wasn't under any investigation, even when repeatedly presented with the facts? 

fuzz81 --- 361 days ago -

Your "fake news" parroting talking point is on an exponential downward spiral, and it's all you've got left. People are dropping the fake news line after the supposed "fake news" is ultimately shown to be the real news, repeatedly. 

JustWatching --- 361 days ago -

Remember when you were sooooooo sure that trump campaign wasn't under any investigation, even when repeatedly presented with the facts?

I never said the campaign was not under investigation, I said Pres Trump is not under investigation. Read it again. There is a difference. They still haven't proven collusion at all. Not even close. 

fuzz81 --- 361 days ago -

Who's campaign is under investigation? 

RayofHope --- 361 days ago -

Your "fake news" parroting talking point is on an exponential downward spiral, and it's all you've got left. People are dropping the fake news line after the supposed "fake news" is ultimately shown to be the real news, repeatedly.

A little funny statement with the current news that Kushner is being accused of setting up a backdoor line with Russia.

Now the reality:

Every president for the past 40 years has had a backdoor line with other countries.

The Cuban Missal crisis was resolved through a backdoor line to Russia (John Kennedy set it up).

Also, I was watching the debate video of Obama ridiculing Romney. Romney had claimed Russia was a bigger threat to the U.S. than ISIS. Obama even went on to point out that Russia was no longer a threat in the post-cold-war world.

And you don't think fake news is rampant? 

wayward1 --- 361 days ago -

Every president for the past 40 years has had a backdoor line with other countries.

Did they set up those lines of communications outside of the U.S. intel community? Cause that's the concern here. 

fuzz81 --- 361 days ago -

And you don't think fake news is rampant??

On OAN, fox, breitbart, infowars, the blaze etc, yes it is rampant. 

RayofHope --- 361 days ago -

On OAN, fox, breitbart, infowars, the blaze etc, yes it is rampant.?

You left out CNN and MSNBC. 

RayofHope --- 361 days ago -

Did they set up those lines of communications outside of the U.S. intel community? Cause that's the concern here.?

The news story I saw yesterday said Kennedy initiated talks with Russia outside the intel community to stop the Cuban Missle Crisis. 

RayofHope --- 361 days ago -

In fact, John Kennedy sent private messages directly to Khruschev through his brother Robert.

What would happen if Trump sent private messages to Putin through Kushner in the current (fake news) climate.

It's on the History Channel.
History Channel - Kennedy Talks With Russia

Still want to claim that Kushner did something wrong? Yes....this is more fake news. 

wayward1 --- 361 days ago -

The news story I saw yesterday said Kennedy initiated talks with Russia outside the intel community to stop the Cuban Missle Crisis.?

Not on the White House phone system and not recorded in any way. Hmmmm.

Still, such plans with Russia is collusion. Odd that they would omit these meetings of collusion to establish these channels and then SWEAR on their life there was no collusion with Russia. And we only know of these meetings because of US intel spying on the Russians because they don't trust Kislyak. 

Emperor of Kingwood --- 361 days ago -

Still, such plans with Russia is collusion.

No its not. Read the legal definition. 

wayward1 --- 361 days ago -

No its not. Read the legal definition.?

Well that's good. It's one thing the can check off the list to investigate.

I however see a very Hannity like "vacation" approaching for Jared. 

Butterbean --- 361 days ago -

OANN:



Just another right wing rag
 

RayofHope --- 361 days ago -

Butterbean - Strange that you would provide a link to Media Matters, probably the most perverse (pseudo) news site on the internet, probably funded by George Soros.

I went through the article. A few of the questions were soft, but most were pretty objective. And, objectivity is what's missing with most news sites.

A couple of months ago, I watched CNN ask the first question (of Spicer) during a WH press conference. It was:

Are you going to tell the truth today?

Can you honestly say the CNN question is objective?

Any reasonable (objective) person would have to admit we are in a fake news climate. Probably because many quality news organizations have cut their budget, gotten rid of veteran reporters, and are looking for sensationalism to get attention. 

fuzz81 --- 361 days ago -

That's a perfectly valid question when he lies every day 

page 1
Login to add your comments!

see more discussions about...

politics


Online now:
hit counters

Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Ice Box

Kingwood Underground