A top national attorney in consultation with U.S. attorneys confirmed to Big League Politics that special counsel Robert Mueller and members of his team can be formally disbarred for waging the ?Russia? case against President Donald Trump. Mueller and his associates have glaring conflicts of interest in the case concerning Trump.

Hillary Clinton colluded with the Russians in selling them our uranium. Clinton handpicked Mueller to give a sample of uranium to the Russians, and Mueller subsequently flew to Moscow, according to publicly available documents.

Peter Strzok, who oversaw the Hillary Clinton email investigation for the FBI and interviewed Hillary Clinton, is on Mueller?s team.

Clinton donor Jeannie Rhee, who represented the Clinton Foundation and also Hillary Clinton during the email investigation, is on Mueller?s team.

Aaron Zebley, who repped Clinton aide and key email-scandal figure Justin Cooper, is on Mueller?s team.

Andrew Weissmann defended the federal government?s surveillance rights in a panel discussion at the George Soros-funded New America Foundation, is also an Obama donor.

Preet Bharara, the man who prosecuted conservative writer Dinesh D?Souza and was a leading contender to be Hillary Clinton?s theoretical Attorney General, was fired by the Trump administration, presenting another conflict of interest that he seems to have no intention of hiding.

How about Mueller himself?

CIA and NSA whistleblower Dennis Montgomery identified former FBI director Mueller as having overseen a secret surveillance program that spied on Trump?s phone calls for years. The alleged program, created during the Bush administration and run by Obama intelligence officials John Brennan and James Clapper, is detailed on 47 hard drives that Montgomery and his lawyer turned over to the FBI, which James Comey buried. Montgomery is suing Obama, Brennan, Clapper and others in a case before D.C. District Court Judge Richard Leon. This case is being watched closely by insiders on both sides of the Russia probe.

Mueller also helped stonewall the Obama administration?s ?investigation? of its own IRS targeting scandal.

As Big League Politics reported, Mueller has formed a political team with his friend, fired FBI director James Comey, and the current FBI director Andrew McCabe to work together against President Donald Trump. But Mueller and Comey are not the ringleaders. Surprisingly, it?s McCabe.

An inside source told Big League Politics that McCabe is ?running the show,? and ?he?s the key.?

?Mueller and McCabe are assembling a better political operation than Hillary had in the campaign. The trio of Mueller/McCabe and Comey are all creatures of the swamp,? the source explained. ?Any Republican who thinks this isn?t a political operation and isn?t geared toward impacting 2018 and beyond is absolutely nuts.?

?I think McCabe is the most politically savvy given how he navigated the controversy with his wife?s campaign donations and the Clinton investigation,? the source continued.

McCabe took over when Comey got fired and quickly set up the team?s power play. McCabe said that Comey did not get fired from the FBI for performance issues. That sets up the premise for a potential obstruction of justice move by the McCabe-Mueller-Comey trio. 

No comment from the left. I believe that Mueller is going to be fired and another impartial person will take his place. 

Oh man, THAT would kick the conspiracy minded into freakin' overdrive! Anything after that will be static noise. 

I certainly hope that this is true! So many democrat supporters stacked up in his team, how on earth could we be expected to think they are able to be impartial? 

how on earth could we be expected to think they are able to be impartial?

Because they are competent professionals who can do their job.

I truly do not understand this almost given belief that someone who happens to be a democrat - would lie or misrepresent or in some other way do an improper investigation. 

Jr has changed his story on his meeting with the Russians - 4 times ?? - That's ok, yet you question the integrity of these men and women. 

AMDG --- 4 min ago - quote - hide comments
how on earth could we be expected to think they are able to be impartial?

Because they are competent professionals who can do their job.

I truly do not understand this almost given belief that someone who happens to be a democrat - would lie or misrepresent or in some other way do an improper investigation.?


History shows it to be true. Can you name a time in history when democrats FAIRLY judged the actions of a Republican? Also, if the intentions are to be impartial, why stack the deck? 

History shows it to be true. Can you name a time in history when democrats FAIRLY judged the actions of a Republican?

These are not politicians - they are Americans working for the DOJ - some of whom seem to be democrats.

Show me in history where it is proper in America to judge if someone is competent of their job or not because of their personal political preference. 

Can you name a time in history when democrats FAIRLY judged the actions of a Republican?

Probably thousands of times a day and probably thousands of times a day when Republicans fairly judged democrats. In courts all over the country.

This is not the house or senate overtly political hearing - this is an investigation being conducted by the DOJ. The individual personal politics of the investigators have nothing to do with their ability to fairly do their job. 

Apparently, I'm not the only one with a problem with this set up. You are welcome to your opinion, as am I. We will both see what happens. 

Apparently, I'm not the only one with a problem with this set up. You are welcome to your opinion, as am I. We will both see what happens.

Agree - 

I bring up the rule about "conflicts of interest" in the Special Prosecutors office. There doesn't have to a conflict of interest only an appearance of a conflict of interest. Hiring only democrats and supporters of HRC seems to be a conflict of interest. This is in violation of the laws governing the special prosecutor. How can a person who is violating the law look at someone else for law violations? It sure doesn't make sense to me. 

Jr has changed his story on his meeting with the Russians - 4 times ?? -

Let me ask you a question. Could you remember a 30 minute meeting in detail 1 year after it occurred? Especially if nothing happened in it and it was a waste of time and meant nothing to you.

It seems to me that you expect perfection from everybody on the opposite side but not from your own side. 

Could you remember a 30 minute meeting in detail 1 year after it occurred? Especially if nothing happened in it and it was a waste of time and meant nothing to you.

Especially since there was no law being broken. 

Especially since there was no law being broken.?

So true. I wonder why there wasn't any question by the left when HRC said "I can't remember" a ton of times when asked questions during her email investigation. Where was the outrage then? Good ol' double standard. 

Especially since there was no law being broken.?


Wouldn't make any difference to the lock steppers... 

I would think you would have a better memory of a meeting you thought you were having with a member of the Russian government to obtain official documents that were going to help your father become president. 

Especially since there was no law being broken.?

You keep saying that with such certainty. Were you at this meeting to and jr forgot you as well 

You keep saying that with such certainty. Were you at this meeting to and jr forgot you as well

There is no law against a private citizen meeting a Russian private citizen. 

These Russian related threads against Trump are beyond stupid. They are just distractions to screw the rest of us. Trump's base support is starting to slide. He is a lifelong democrat. If Hildabeast won we're probably near the same scenario going after her and Osama about their Russian collusion. Who murdered Seth Rich, the Haiti official about to expose the Clinton foundation,and John Ashe? 

AMDG --- 10 hours ago - quote - hide comments
Especially since there was no law being broken.?

You keep saying that with such certainty. Were you at this meeting to and jr forgot you as well?

I guess you haven't read the FEC laws that allow a foreign national to provide info as long as the info isn't classified or stolen and as long as the foreign national is unpaid. Therefore, even he had been given info it would have been legal. I guess the laws really don't matter to the left. BTW...collusion is an anti-trust term. The is no law against "collusion" with a foreign person. 

I guess you haven't read the FEC laws

Seems like me and the DOJ have not heard of this. They seem to be pretty darn interested in Russian involvement in the election and possible ties to the current administration. And as much as I value your legal expertise - seems like the highest level of law enforcement in the nation appears to disagree. 

seems like the highest level of law enforcement in the nation appears to disagree.

Yet they don't say what violation of the law they are investigating. 

Yet they don't say what violation of the law they are investigating.

exactly how many times do we have to go through this do loop.

You say "what law"
I give you the applicable CFR
You say " info not value"

I would guess by now we each understand the others position -

Maybe we can have some short cut - to save us some time on this ?? 

You say "what law"
I give you the applicable CFR

Ok, then why won't Meuller and his crowd say that? Why won't the FBI say that?

The CFR you keep referencing is not applicable because its clear no law has been broken. 

It's comforting to know that smarter people than any of you are handling this... 

The CFR you keep referencing is not applicable because its clear no law has been broken.

Think we are done Emp - this is asked and answered like 50 times - we just disagree - when you have a new argument let me know. 

when you have a new argument let me know.

When you have proof of a law being broken let me know.