LOL


Poll: Hillary Clinton Is Less Popular Than Trump

By Osita Nwanevu
2017-Stephan-Weiss-Apple-Awards
Hillary Clinton speaks at the Stephan Weiss Apple Awards on June 7 in New York City.
Getty Images for Urban Zen Found

A Bloomberg poll released Tuesday shows that eight months after November?s election and nearly half a year into the new administration, Hillary Clinton is a touch less popular than Donald Trump. From Bloomberg:

Trump?s 2016 Democratic rival is viewed favorably by just 39 percent of Americans in the latest Bloomberg National Poll, two points lower than the president. It?s the second-lowest score for Clinton since the poll started tracking her in September 2009.
The former secretary of state has always been a polarizing figure, but this survey shows she?s even lost popularity among those who voted for her in November.
According to Bloomberg, more than a fifth of Clinton voters now say they view her unfavorably compared with only 8 percent of likely Clinton voters saying the same in Bloomberg's last poll before the election. Bloomberg?s John McCormick writes that interviews with some of those polled suggest that the decline has less to do with Clinton losing than it does with the Democratic Party?s identity crisis. ?Many said they wished Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont had won the Democratic nomination,? he writes, ?or that they never liked Clinton and only voted for her because she was the lesser of two bad choices.?

By Osita Nwanevu 

Uh. What's trumps approval? Hint: lowest approval of any president in history 

Benji now believes the polls are accurate 

Who cares?? Trump is president, let's worry about what he's doing/saying. 

fuzz81 --- 2 hours ago - quote - hide comments
Uh. What's trumps approval? Hint: lowest approval of any president in history

Who cares? 

The vast majority of people, who despise him care 

One of these days people will get their head out of the sand and realize that all the moaning; complaining; and crying is not going to change things. We got him for 4 years; give him a chance

Is that better?! 

A presidents job is not to be the most well liked president in history. He needs to do his job. He is trying to do that in spirt of the multiple daily liberal media attacks. 

media attacks.
When a politician does something that is detrimental to we the people. Should we not be made aware of it?

Loosing health care or medicare cuts does not benefit anyone. The list goes on 

medicare cuts

Obama did that. 

Hillary who? 

the Markster --- 12 hours ago - quote - hide comments
media attacks.
When a politician does something that is detrimental to we the people. Should we not be made aware of it?

Loosing health care or medicare cuts does not benefit anyone. The list goes on

Yes, indeed...watch the tax increases that Obamacare causes and watch it fail. The year 2018 will be interesting as more insurance companies pull out of the exchanges and people can't get insurance ...yet will have to pay a penalty for no insurance. Did I mention the triple digit increases in the premiums...no...well watch that too. 

fuzz81 --- 1 days ago - quote - hide comments
The vast majority of people, who despise him care?

Vast majority? What's your source of this or is it your own opinion that you state like it is fact? 

Fuzz appointed himself "Vast Majority Spokesperson". 

He's still better than the most despised politician......nice job Trumpy!!! Aim high! LOL 

Yes, indeed...watch the tax increases that Obamacare causes

My taxes have not gone up. Did yours? 

Dog park would be a plus out here,and yes taxes go up every year. 

No one cares. She's not president. She's history.

The Idiot in Chief is worst president ever, in collusion with his Comrades. Will be hung.

LMFAO 

The Idiot in Chief is worst president ever, in collusion with his Comrades. Will be hung.

Please tell me about the proof you have to make a statement like that. BTW...maybe you should read the definition of Libel! 

Actually, JW, that would be slander. 

sdanielmcev --- 8 hours ago - quote - hide comments
Actually, JW, that would be slander.?

Not quite...slander is spoken and libel is written. 

Lord, it's like the divorced guy who keeps talking about his ex-wife whose remarried and never talks about him. 

I believe it. But, she got away with the uranium deal to the Russians and will never be prosecuted. 

I guess Trump calling Comey a real nut job would be slander, not libel, then, correct? 

That's true unless what he said is true. Or hurt him in some way. He got a big book deal. You could make the argument that Pres Trump helped him. 

I guess Trump calling Comey a real nut job would be slander, not libel, then, correct?

Its neither. Its opinion. 

ayofHope --- 6 hours ago - quote - hide comments
I believe it. But, she got away with the uranium deal to the Russians and will never be prosecuted.?

She got away with a lot more than that. 

RayofHope --- 12 hours ago - quote - hide comments
I believe it. But, she got away with the uranium deal to the Russians and will never be prosecuted.?

How about the $500,000 Clinton got for a speech he gave in Russia? Where is the media on this?

The old democrat double standard. 

How about the $500,000 Clinton got for a speech he gave in Russia? Where is the media on this?

The old democrat double standard.

So was the State Department the only government agency that was required to approve the sale? 

^^^^^^^^
Here is a link you might find interesting. It says that only Obama could have stopped the deal.

Uranium One Deal 

Trump?s claim is a reductive version of his source material?s findings and runs into several problems.

First, the State Department did approve of Russia?s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn?t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.

Second, while nine people related to the company did donate to the Clinton Foundation, it?s unclear whether they were still involved in the company by the time of the Russian deal and stood to benefit from it.

Third, most of their Clinton Foundation donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton?s 2008 presidential bid, before she could have known she would become secretary of state.

The bottom line: While the connections between the Clinton Foundation and the Russian deal may appear fishy, there?s simply no proof of any quid pro quo.

We rate Trump?s claim Mostly False.

Trump Mostly False 

I really hate defending Hillary. 

Poll: Hillary Clinton Is Less Popular Than Trump

Ok. So? HRC isnt president. What is the point of this? Is this part of American Greatness that Trump promised?

Our sitting president wants to pardon himself. Does that speak of American Greatness?

I am still interested in anyone predicting the day, month and year Trump is impeached and/or jailed. 

Get over Hillary. She lost. What is up with the far rights obsession with her?