Kingwood Underground
the heart and soul of our Kingwood, Texas family
Login - Create Account - Help
Clean out your garage on Kingwood bookoo! Or find local garage sales on Yard Sale Search.com
KU Live!

Obama & Hillary Do Not Get It

who's talking here?

SoupIsGoodFood 35
RiteWingKing 2
steinhoister2016 9
Defcon1 1
Miss Understanding 2
DatBoyHooD 21
Emperor of Kingwood 23
DVaz 1
Judas 1
a889324uu 3
Markster 16
Slider152 8
Butterbean 15
Prolix Raconteur 12
jacobson 1
Jepperd 3
RayofHope 20
AMDG 4
FNHO 9
them 3
fuzz81 53
Behold the pale horse 10

     » send to friend     » save in my favorites     » flag dangerous topic flag as a dangerous topic

page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
RayofHope --- 3 years ago -

David Cameron gets it. Francois Hollande get is it. Belgian gets is. But, Obama and Clinton are still arguing over semantics.

They are more concerned about avoiding calling ISL or ISIS ?..Islamic. We should join the rest of the world calling for action against this group than arguing over what to call them.

Besides, how can you avoid Islamic, when ISIL stands for Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. ISIS stands for the Islamic State of Iraq. Their arguments are pretty petty.

I can see why they deflect, since Hilliary as Secretary of State and Obama brought us to the state of the world. You cannot avoid what the world has become under the Obama and Clinton tenures.

Today a commentator pointed out something often overlooked by everyone. When Obama slams Christians (as he did after Christians were beheaded by Muslims), he speaks without a teleprompter. But, when he speaks about Islam he uses a teleprompter and chooses words carefully. In short, he is more concerned about not offending Muslims killing than offending those being killed.

Remember, it was not long ago that Obama called ISIS a JV group.

When you watch the news, think about who brought you this chaos. It is hard to blame Bush since he left office a long time ago. 

steinhoister2016 --- 3 years ago -

When you watch the news, think about who brought you this chaos. It is hard to blame Bush since he left office a long time ago


No it isn't...this would be happening no matter who is in office, it's not all about us. 

RayofHope --- 3 years ago -

Why blame Bush, when John Kennedy is the real reason for the state of the world. He facilitated the overthrow of a Democratically elected Vietnamese president and was outmaneuvered by the Cubans.

...........On second thought, we should blame the indecision of Jimmy Carter.


Just joking. Every president, including Bush, have mistakes in their administration.

But people defending Obama and Clinton are the ones that should accept the fact that when people run for office and promise to straighten out the world, they should be held accountable.

Obama is looking more and more foolish these days. But, the people swallowing his foolishness are the ones really looking foolish. 

fuzz81 --- 3 years ago -

Maybe you don't get it? 

steinhoister2016 --- 3 years ago -

You wouldn't hold a Republican any more accountable than Democrats hold Obama...don't even pretend. 

Behold the pale horse --- 3 years ago -

Maybe you don't get it?

Its clear you don't. 

fuzz81 --- 3 years ago -

What makes that clear? republicans are going to "fix" ISIS how exactly? Calling them Islamists? Oh boy, what a great strategy. Brilliant. 

fuzz81 --- 3 years ago -

Shake your cane at them and yell at them to get off your lawn while you're at it 

Behold the pale horse --- 3 years ago -

Calling them Islamists? Oh boy, what a great strategy.

Who said that was a strategy? However, unless you know the enemy you will not defeat them. Failing to acknowledge that they do not differentiate theology from government is na├»ve. 

fuzz81 --- 3 years ago -

Nobody is confused who the enemies are. Except you, because you want to declare war against ALL Muslims, correct? 

Behold the pale horse --- 3 years ago -

because you want to declare war against ALL Muslims, correct?

Reading and comprehension is really a challenge for you isn't it. Nowhere have I said anything remotely like that. However, ignoring and failing to acknowledge that this sect of Islam is radicalized and bent on world domination is still naive and dangerous. 

Behold the pale horse --- 3 years ago -

Nobody is confused who the enemies are. Except you,

Since you know so much about this, why don't you pick up a rifle and stand a post. 

steinhoister2016 --- 3 years ago -

Had to go after the Nazis even though not all Germans were nazis... 

Behold the pale horse --- 3 years ago -

Had to go after the Nazis even though not all Germans were nazis...

Exactly. This brand of radical Islam is a political movement not theological. 

fuzz81 --- 3 years ago -

Good, then acknowledge hitler was a Christian extremist. Acknowledge westboro baptist are Christian extremists. Acknowledge that fundamental Christians are radicalized and bent on world domination. See the problem? Starts to sound like ALL Christians are evil, when in fact they aren't, doesn't it? 

Behold the pale horse --- 3 years ago -

Good, then acknowledge hitler was a Christian extremist. Acknowledge westboro baptist are Christian extremists. Acknowledge that fundamental Christians are radicalized and bent on world domination. See the problem? Starts to sound like ALL Christians are evil, when in fact they aren't, doesn't it?

Hitler never used Christianity as a method of political force. He created the Nazi party which was not tied to Christianity.

The Westbury Baptist have perverted the Christian faith, but are inconsequential, just nut cases.

Name one radicalized Christian fundamentalist intent on world domination by force and employee terroristic tactics.

See the problem, you totally failed with that Jr. High level analogy. 

fuzz81 --- 3 years ago -

Name one radicalized Christian fundamentalist intent on world domination by force and employee terroristic tactics.

george bush 

Behold the pale horse --- 3 years ago -

george bush

Are you kidding with this? Name one time when Bush used Christianity to justify any force of arms. Name one time when B push said his purpose was Christian domination of the world?

This just keeps getting worse for you doesn't it. 

fuzz81 --- 3 years ago -

George Bush has claimed he was on a mission from God when he launched the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, according to a senior Palestinian politician in an interview to be broadcast by the BBC later this month.
Mr Bush revealed the extent of his religious fervour when he met a Palestinian delegation during the Israeli-Palestinian summit at the Egpytian resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, four months after the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

One of the delegates, Nabil Shaath, who was Palestinian foreign minister at the time, said: "President Bush said to all of us: 'I am driven with a mission from God'. God would tell me, 'George go and fight these terrorists in Afghanistan'. And I did. And then God would tell me 'George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq'. And I did." 

Behold the pale horse --- 3 years ago -

If you believe any of that.

No where does it say Christian. Many religions have a monotheistic belief.

You need to take the hate religious blinders off. 

steinhoister2016 --- 3 years ago -

He did say that...as nutty as it sounds. 

Behold the pale horse --- 3 years ago -

It does sound a little nutty. 

RayofHope --- 3 years ago -

0 

RayofHope --- 3 years ago -

Blaming Bushing for the problems of a guy in office for SEVEN YEARS is pretty lame. 

Jepperd --- 3 years ago -

How is Obama more to blame over the current ISIS situation than Bush? 

FNHO --- 3 years ago -

We should join the rest of the world calling for action against this group than arguing over what to call them.

Ahem. There's been action for over a year.

Did you really think the attacks by the French against ISIL were the first action??

Change the station sir. 

FNHO --- 3 years ago -

 

Emperor of Kingwood --- 3 years ago -

How is Obama more to blame over the current ISIS situation than Bush?

Because he had the chance to eradicate them early in their development and did not. Because he left Iraq without a status of forces agreement. 

steinhoister2016 --- 3 years ago -

Blaming Bushing for the problems of a guy in office for SEVEN YEARS is pretty lame.?


Think back on this when you're blaming Obama in 7 years... 

fuzz81 --- 3 years ago -

They'll be too busy blaming Hillary 

Jepperd --- 3 years ago -

Because he had the chance to eradicate them early in their development and did not. Because he left Iraq without a status of forces agreement.?


That's such a week argument. Might as well blame Clinton for 9/11 because he didnt kill Osama 

RiteWingKing --- 3 years ago -

Because he left Iraq without a status of forces agreement.

Obama implemented Bush's agreement. 

a889324uu --- 3 years ago -

However, ignoring and failing to acknowledge that this sect of Islam is radicalized and bent on world domination is still naive and dangerous.

Who is ignoring that?


Name one radicalized Christian fundamentalist intent on world domination by force and employee terroristic tactics.

Ted Cruz, Ben Carson. I can name 20 more if you would like. 

a889324uu --- 3 years ago -

However, ignoring and failing to acknowledge that this sect of Islam is radicalized and bent on world domination is still naive and dangerous.

Who is ignoring that?


Name one radicalized Christian fundamentalist intent on world domination by force and employee terroristic tactics.

Ted Cruz, Ben Carson. I can name 20 more if you would like. 

RiteWingKing --- 3 years ago -

Da'ish uses Fox News as a recruiting tool. All the inflammatory rhetoric is hurting the USA and our allies..

Loose lips recruits more Islamic cultists. 

Emperor of Kingwood --- 3 years ago -

That's such a week argument. Might as well blame Clinton for 9/11 because he didnt kill Osama

That works. Clinton even had the chance to have Bin Laden taken into custody and didn't. 

Emperor of Kingwood --- 3 years ago -

Ted Cruz, Ben Carson. I can name 20 more if you would like.

You haven't named any. Neither has anyone else. 

a889324uu --- 3 years ago -

^ your lack of ability to read and comprehend is your cross to bear, not mine.

Your willful ignorance regarding the political Christian terrorists like Carson and Cruz is also your issue...not mine.

You just like them because they think like you. 

Jepperd --- 3 years ago -

^ your lack of ability to read and comprehend is your cross to bear, not mine.

Your willful ignorance regarding the political Christian terrorists like Carson and Cruz is also your issue...not mine.

You just like them because they think like you.?



i dont know what is stupider, saying Obama is more to blame for the mess in the middle east, or saying that Carson and Cruz are christian terrorist.... 

fuzz81 --- 3 years ago -

And why is that stupid? If Carson were in power, you don't think he'd go terrorize people like he beat his mother with a hammer?

Read the legal definition of a terrorist. The only thing missing so far is the violence. Help us all if those morons obtain the power to control the military. 

page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Login to add your comments!

see more discussions about...

politics


Online now:
hit counters

Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Ice Box

Kingwood Underground