Fixed it for ya 

Here This one says labor participation rate

undefined 

Like a dog on a bone. Funny.

73 months of job growth. Historic. 

Lowest jpr in 48 years historic 

US unemployed have quit looking for jobs at a 'frightening' level: -CNBC 

Just 3 more days. 

Hillary will get right on continuing and improving the ACA.

The ACA is dead. It's only a matter of burying it. It can't work if there aren't any insurance companies. 

Dat - just FYI

Structural Changes to Participation Rate
From 2006 to 2016, the U.S. civilian labor force participation rate has hovered in the 62 to 67 range, with a fairly consistent decrease in the participation rate since 2009. The decline in the participation rate has been attributed to structural changes and not the overall health of the economy. This structural change in the amount of people actively seeking work has occured due to retiring baby boomers, a decline in working women, and more people deciding to attend college. 

Amdg - just FYI

While studying employment, another important figure to determine is the labor force participation rate. Here, we compare the size of the labor force with the number of people that could potentially be a part of the labor force. It is important to note that we do not include people under the age of 16 in this figure. In addition, students, retirees, the disabled, homemakers, and the voluntarily idle are not counted in the labor force

Source  

LOL.......... the same bit of info that you schooled Fuzzball with. 

Thanks DAT I stand corrected. 

I've never understood how an adult who should be participating in the labor force chooses not to. How do you live? 

Thank you, Mr. President. Hillary will get right on continuing and improving the ACA. Thank you for starting the broad healthcare initiative.

Now I know you are only trying to get people going. You just say things to start arguments. That's a terrible thing to do. 

I've never understood how an adult who should be participating in the labor force chooses not to. How do you live??

I've yet to encounter something you do understand. 

Have you ever noticed that the left just writes propaganda that they get from their party? They try to spin everything to be positive. Anybody who can think for themselves knows what they say is not true or only a half-truth. People like fuzzball only say things to get you going. He really can't be as uninformed as he portends to be. 

That's a terrible thing to do.

They have small minds. 

Or, perhaps, they have great minds with a different vision.

Two more days. You're gonna love it. 

Or, perhaps, they have great minds with a different vision.


That went way over your head. 

It really didn't, Emp.

2 more days. You're gonna love it. 

First president in modern history to not have a single year of 3 percent growth.

That's pathetic.

Spin that fact...... if you can. 

5 of 6 top presidents for GDP growth were Democrats. 

Oh yeah, and Clinton was one of the top for GDP growth, and better than any republican in history.

Therefore by soups metrics, Clinton is a better president than any republican bar none. 

LOL....... thanks for proving my point, fuzzball. You won't see Obama's name on that chart. Ever. 

Or another republican. Ever. 

And you do agree that Clinton was a better president than Reagan, because Clinton had higher GDP growth, right soupy? 

We're talking about Obama and his failed economy. Please keep up/ 

What party was in control of congress during clinton surplus and GDP growth.. hint starts with a R 

LOL.......... fuzzball is going to divert with something else. 

What party was in control of congress during clinton surplus and GDP growth.. hint starts with a R

Yes. Lets also not forget the Carter economy inherited by Reagan with double digit inflation and interest rates. Lets also try and remember the Carter's CRA and Clintons changes to the CRA which ushered in the housing crash at the end of Bushs' term that was ignored by Barney (the banking queen) Franks who was chairman of the House Banking Committee. 

You're crushing their talking points, Bob 

Fuzz will avoid this thread now 

Just 2 more days.

Full Supreme Court, etc., etc. 

...and the death of single payer.

That's your choice. Own it. 

What party was in control of congress during clinton surplus and GDP growth.. hint starts with a R?

What party is in control of congress now? Oh, right. 

You're crushing their talking points, Bob?

You should learn the definition of "talking point".

I'm pointing out the gigantic irony in your statement about obama GDP growth. The facts are democrats have always been best at growing the economy.

You also missed my original point, that you can't judge a president on a single metric. 

What party was in control of congress during clinton surplus and GDP growth.. hint starts with a R?

What party is in control of congress now? Oh, right.

According to the democrats and Clinton the economy has improved .. 

Which party was in control of congress during the final years of bush presidency.. 

I'm pointing out the gigantic irony in your statement about obama GDP growth. The facts are democrats have always been best at growing the economy.

But not Obama. That's what I'm pointing out. 

According to the democrats and Clinton the economy has improved ..?

It has.

It's not our fault you're a washed up wannabe rapper.