Thoughts? 

According to Republicans, a new Justice can't be appointed until the next President is sworn in, so...

Great news!!!

Oh, wait. Republican logic is flexible, isn't it? 

Republicans have logic? 

Apparently CNN disagrees with y'all. Lol


Looks like another conservative judge... 

Madison warned about the mischiefs of faction...get out the popcorn. 

Game. Set. Match. 

Anthony Kennedy retires end of July!

Lots of pissed off democrats. 

Ginsberg is next. The supreme court will be dominated by constitutionalists for decades. 

Constitutionalists...code for ?the party?. 

Let me help you with that...

Constitutionalism is the idea, often associated with the political theories of John Locke and the founders of the American republic, that government can and should be legally limited in its powers, and that its authority or legitimacy depends on its observing these limitations. 

Right and if it was stacked with democrats (liberals) they would be saying ?the Supreme Court is dominated by constitutionalists?...Also code for ?the party?.

My point is, neither side cares if this country burns as long as they can rule the ashes. 

My point is, neither side cares if this country burns as long as they can rule the ashes.

I tend to agree with you ... 

My point is a true constitutionalist believes in the original, literal intent of the constitution. Not this living document mumbo jumbo whereby it's twisted to accommodate the latest social engineering experiment du jour. 

We?re an ever changing society. Just like the dinosaurs, if you can?t adapt you die off...but if you want to cling to the myth of returning to an idyllic post war USA then by all means. I choose to capitalize on progress. 

Apparently CNN disagrees with y'all. Lol



SciFi is #winning! Watch out all! 

Constitutionalists...code for ?the party?.?



Or code for narrow-minded bigots who believe all men are most certainly unequal and should be treated as such. 

Uh Oh, someone pulled out the "RACISM" card. That didn't take long. 

I will go edit that because my point wasn't delivered correctly. They're not just racists. They're bigots against anything and anyone that doesn't fall within their narrow-minded thinking. "Thinking".....I use that term loosely. 

According to Republicans, a new Justice can't be appointed until the next President is sworn in, so...



Um it is not a presidential election year. 

They're bigots against anything and anyone that doesn't fall within their narrow-minded thinking. "Thinking".....I use that term loosely.

You mean like the folks that own the restaurant that kicked Sarah Sanders out? 

More like the baker... 

Yipee! I hope Ginsburg is next! It can't happen too soon! 

Constitutionalists...code for ?the party?.

Code for non-communists. 

You mean like the folks that own the restaurant that kicked Sarah Sanders out??
That was so wrong and WRONG! Even when I was a Democrat I did not approve of things like this and even if I hated a President I still referred to them as President So and So because fellow Americans had voted them in and therefore you just did it. 

She isn?t the president. And doesn?t deserve to be treated as such any more than I do. I don?t agree with what they did, but let?s not get carried away here... 

She isn?t the president. And doesn?t deserve to be treated as such any more than I do. I don?t agree with what they did, but let?s not get carried away here...
But the woman just wanted to eat? :( 

And doesn?t deserve to be treated as such any more than I do.
But, she isn't a self-described Jackass?! heeheehee 

She doesn?t have to self describe, she puts it on display daily... 

My point is a true constitutionalist believes in the original, literal intent of the constitution.

Except for the parts that you don?t like. You want those interpreted as you see fit.

How about that emoluments clause, prollyboy? Pretty ironic of you to have a man crush on trump, who so blatantly wipes his behind with your beloved constitution. 

You're twisting in the wind fuzzy. What the hell does the emoluments clause have to do with this topic? You conflate my acknowledgement of Trump's successes as a "man crush" while you're so blinded by delusional hatred you've lost any ability to look at anything he's accomplished objectively. 

^ Truth ^ 

you're so blinded by delusional hatred you've lost any ability to look at anything he's accomplished objectively.


Pretty much the definition of party politics... 

You conflate my acknowledgement of Trump's successes as a "man crush" while you're so blinded by delusional hatred you've lost any ability to look at anything he's accomplished objectively.?

That is a lovely sentence...it even has some lovely rhythm to it. I am green with envy :( 

I'm pretty sure he cared Mark. He's a man whos's worked hard all his life. Few get to the level that these Supreme Court judges get to.

Just bc you don't like Trump and he gets to appoint the next judge does not mean NOW that he's a bad guy. And "doesn't care." LOL 

^^^^
+1 

Just bc you don't like Trump and he gets to appoint the next judge does not mean NOW that he's a bad guy.

And just because you say its so does not mean its so.

Simply because Trump sux.
Justice Kennedy is the bad guy. 

Mark comes up with the pithy, "I'm rubber, you're glue!" 

It is so if it's true Mark. Good grief.

Why is he bad? He's faithfully served his county. WHY? One reason, just ONE.