Kingwood Underground
the heart and soul of our Kingwood, Texas family
Login - Create Account - Help
Clean out your garage on Kingwood bookoo! Or find local garage sales on Yard Sale Search.com
KU Live!

Kavanaugh

who's talking here?

SoupIsGoodFood 17
jackass 13
CavemanBarney 1
AwesomeTattooedDragon 14
I_won't_tell 5
Let Logic Prevail 1
SagaciousSighFiGurl 5
TinktheSprite 2
sheddy 2
sdanielmcev 8
Emperor of Kingwood 12
DVaz 6
SodaPopAndRitalin 3
Markster 30
Butterbean 1
Prolix Raconteur 4
fuzz81 8
OrdinaryGuy 14

     » send to friend     » save in my favorites     » flag dangerous topic flag as a dangerous topic

I_won't_tell --- 26 days ago -

Ms. Ford, do you believe in this American principle of justice: a person is innocent, until proven guilty?

Ms. Ford, how old were you, when this alleged party took place?

Can you provide the date & time of this alleged party?

Can you provide the address, where this alleged party took place?

Can you give us a list of names of the people at the party?

Did you drink any alcohol at this alleged party?

Do you take any drugs at this alleged party?

Did your parents know you were at this alleged party?

Did your parents approve of your drinking at the age of 15?

Ms. Ford you have provided no evidence that this alleged party even took place.

If you can?t provide any evidence that this alleged party took place, how we are to believe anything else you say about this alleged party? 

Emperor of Kingwood --- 26 days ago -

But she's supposed to be believed anyway because women don't lie about things like this. 

Prolix Raconteur --- 26 days ago -

Her lying attorney says she has no motivation to fabricate the claim "nor a political bone in her body". Let's see...

Kavanaugh's mother was a magistrate who who ruled against her parent's in the foreclosure on their home, but dismissed the case after they settled with the bank.

Her brother works for the law firm that represents Fusion GPS.

She donated to multiple liberal causes and candidates over the years.

She flew to Washington to participate in anti Trump rallies.

She scrubbed all her social media history as soon as things began to go public, hiding her true sentiment on issues that could tarnish her motivation.

She can't remember what year or where this supposedly occurred.

She has zero witnesses and alternately told her therapist there were 4 boys in the room and then 2 boys.

But the damage is done now, and she's tainted the entire process. Mission accomplished. I smell a book deal in her future. 

OrdinaryGuy --- 26 days ago -

And a confirmation of a Supreme Court Justice! 

Markster --- 25 days ago -

But she's supposed to be believed anyway because women don't lie about things like this.

bob...What does Dr Ford have to gain by lying about what happened?

Shame on Republican senators for not demanding an investigation. Its like they dont want to have to pick someone else. "We the people" deserve the best. Not 2nd best. 

Emperor of Kingwood --- 25 days ago -

bob...What does Dr Ford have to gain by lying about what happened?


Well lets start with revenge. Also, shes a Dem contributor so she believes or has been convinced that she has it within her power to block the appointment of a conservative judge to SCOTUS. Mark, that really easy to see. 

Emperor of Kingwood --- 25 days ago -

Shame on Republican senators for not demanding an investigation.

Investigate what? An unsubstantiated claim with no verifiable basis in fact or corroboration from a person with a political AND personal agenda? 

SoupIsGoodFood --- 25 days ago -

Liberals have gone beyond the bounds of desperation with this one.

When Kavanaugh finally gets confirmed. They're going to go ballistic. 

Markster --- 25 days ago -

so she believes or has been convinced that she has it within her power to block the appointment of a conservative judge to SCOTUS.

Why would she want to do that? 2nd point.
Why would "we the people" want a person that has so little regard? Why should such a person (if guilty) deserve a lifetime appointment? Can we not find anyone better qualified for this job? bob. 

Markster --- 25 days ago -

Investigate what? An unsubstantiated claim with no verifiable basis in fact or corroboration from a person with a political AND personal agenda?

bob, you truly have no heart.
She told her shrink and her husband years before Kavanaugh was even on the map. She also took a lie detector and passed. Verification: check. 

Emperor of Kingwood --- 25 days ago -

Can we not find anyone better qualified for this job?

You could always read the Constitution so you know how the process works. We the people did select by virtue of the last general election. 

Emperor of Kingwood --- 25 days ago -

Why would she want to do that? 2nd point.

i already explained that to you. 

Emperor of Kingwood --- 25 days ago -

She told her shrink and her husband years before Kavanaugh was even on the map. She also took a lie detector and passed. Verification: check.

All of which is meaningless from an evidence point of view. We are still a country of innocent until proven guilty. Anyone can make any wild accusation they want. Its evidence and corroboration that makes the difference. 

Markster --- 25 days ago -

She also took a lie detector and passed. Verification: check.


All of which is meaningless from an evidence point of view.

^^^I'll never drink that Koolaid. 

Markster --- 25 days ago -

0Kavanaugh is not worthy 

Markster --- 25 days ago -

0pffft Republicans 

Markster --- 25 days ago -

I like Betty
0 

OrdinaryGuy --- 25 days ago -

She also took a lie detector and passed. Verification: check.

There is a reason why lie detector tests are not admissible in court. First of all, it doesn't prove she is telling the truth, it only proves she believes she is telling the truth. Secondly, lie detectors can be beaten.
Maybe markster, you need to read up about lie detector tests. 

sdanielmcev --- 25 days ago -

She also took a lie detector and passed. Verification: check
https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/is-a-polygraph-test-admissible-as-evidence-31737
You may want to brush up on your evidentiary rules, weasel. 

SagaciousSighFiGurl (Mod) --- 25 days ago -

"But she's supposed to be believed anyway because women don't lie about things like this. "



That's not true. There is a tendency to believe her bc right now bc there is a rash of men getting caught, resigning, being fired and confessing. It's not fair for anyone who may be innocent, and that is true. But it's truly about atmosphere right now.

However, as much as I know in my heart this is an epidemic, I also know the vast vast majority of assaults are never reported. It's a part of why this whole thing is imploding now. I hope we learn something....

As far as this particular case, I think this one is suspicious. This only comes up, 35 years later, as a man is nominated to SCOTUS. Only one person. Not dozens. No history of problems.The fighting between party loyalists ( many incapable of an independent thought) on both sides are scratching and fighting for the power of this judge's spot. oh, the power of that spot.

I do not know what is sadder, what is more damaging to our collective soul as a nation, to destroy a possibly innocent man for nothing other than dirty political gain or that another 17 YO girl was assaulted and she Is in the company of thousands of others. 

Emperor of Kingwood --- 25 days ago -

I also know the vast vast majority of assaults are never reported.

The vast majority of the cases where men are resigning and/or being fired isn't assault. Offering more money, a raise a promotion or a sense of job security in exchange for sex is not assault. Bill Cosby is clearly assault. 

Markster --- 25 days ago -

You may want to brush up on your evidentiary rules, weasel.

Id be satisfied if Kavanaugh took a polygraph.
Weasel, is that all you got? 

SagaciousSighFiGurl (Mod) --- 25 days ago -

Right, it's harassment. But the Kavanaugh situation is claiming assault. 

OrdinaryGuy --- 25 days ago -

All of which is meaningless from an evidence point of view.

^^^I'll never drink that Koolaid.?


So you would change our system where no evidence is needed to convict someone. That's kind of stupid! 

jackass --- 25 days ago -

None of you actually care, it?s all about the political victory...your life won?t change one bit because of who gets selected to scotus...and I mean none of you in either side. 

Markster --- 24 days ago -

your life won?t change one bit because of who gets selected to scotus.

Id agree with exception to our future generations. Is this the future we want to leave? Its a matter of fwd thinking for our country. 

Emperor of Kingwood --- 24 days ago -

your life won?t change one bit because of who gets selected to scotus.

I completely disagree. SCOTUS decisions can and do effect your daily life. 

Markster --- 24 days ago -

your life won?t change one bit because of who gets selected to scotus.

I completely disagree. SCOTUS decisions can and do effect your daily life.


Can, and Will are two different things bob. You will never need an abortion. 

AwesomeTattooedDragon --- 24 days ago -

How about deciding the POTUS? It that relevant enough for you, mark? 

Markster --- 24 days ago -

How about deciding the POTUS? It that relevant enough

I believe the topic is Kavanaugh. Yep..I double checked.
But my coffee needs a refill sweets. thx 

Emperor of Kingwood --- 24 days ago -

Can, and Will are two different things bob. You will never need an abortion.

Are you seriously this ill informed? Brown vs the Board of Education, the Heller decision, Miranda decision, Cooper v. Aaron, Engel v. Vitale, Grutter v. Bollinger, et.al 

SagaciousSighFiGurl (Mod) --- 24 days ago -

It?s less painful to stick a fork in your eye Bob lol 

Markster --- 24 days ago -

Are you seriously this ill informed?

Ill informed?
bob! Have you had an abortion?!
How will Kavanaugh possibly being the deciding vote to overturning Roe v Wade effect you? He is pro-birth, a federalist. We all know republicans hate personal freedoms. 

Markster --- 24 days ago -

Kavanaugh

Thursday, 10am
The rubbber hits the road.
The %$@&^ hits the fan
Open hearing! 

AwesomeTattooedDragon --- 24 days ago -

the Markster --- 3 hours ago - quote - hide comments
How about deciding the POTUS? It that relevant enough

I believe the topic is Kavanaugh. Yep..I double checked.
But my coffee needs a refill sweets. thx



So, mark, you don't think SCOTUS determining which candidate was elected President didn't affect anyone's lives? 

Markster --- 24 days ago -

SCOTUS determining which candidate was elected President didn't affect anyone's lives?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Sorry, that just sounds like jibberish...
What are you trying to say? sweets 

AwesomeTattooedDragon --- 24 days ago -

Of all the things you've said, that might be the most uninformed. 

AwesomeTattooedDragon --- 24 days ago -

2000 United States presidential election recount in Florida. ... The Florida vote was ultimately settled in Bush's favor by a margin of 537 votes when the U.S. Supreme Court, in Bush v. Gore, stopped a recount that had been initiated upon a ruling by the Florida Supreme Court. 

Markster --- 24 days ago -

2000 United States presidential election recount in Florida

ahhh yes..

Im pretty sure the only lives affected were Bush's and Gore's. It's likely the lives of thousands of Iraqi's and thousands of Americans in a pre-emptive strike against a country that did nothing to us.

Why do regular people vote republican? 

Markster --- 24 days ago -

That was then, this is now.
Kavanaugh isnt worthy of a lifetime appointment. "We the people" can have better, and we deserve better. btw...The topic is still Kavanaugh 

page 1 2 3 4
Login to add your comments!

see more discussions about...


Online now:
hit counters

Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Ice Box

Kingwood Underground